Participatory planning and the new ATER/ATES: An assessment of the challenges of implementation
Keywords:
Agrarian Reform, Peri-urban Settlements, Participatory Planning, Institutional Economics, Bloomington School, Discourse EthicsAbstract
The article submits our reflections on the challenges of participatory planning and collective management of ATER/ATES services in agrarian reform settlements. The Bloomington School's conceptual framework of institutional economics is employed to interpret these challenges as problems of polycentric governance and collective action for the provision of public goods and management of commonly-owned resources. The Habermasian critique of the limits of the conception of instrumental rationality is incorporated into the analysis to broaden the understanding of the different modes of engagement in the dialogical processes of participation. Based on an integrative scheme of the two approaches and results of previous research, the article concludes by stating the impossibility of replacing the internal willingness to cooperate with institutional engineering schemes and external incentives.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Leandro Frederico Ferraz Meyer, Wilza da Silveira Pinto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.