Seven Editora
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##


Contact

  • Seven Publicações Ltda CNPJ: 43.789.355/0001-14 Rua: Travessa Aristides Moleta, 290- São José dos Pinhais/PR CEP: 83045-090
  • Principal Contact
  • Nathan Albano Valente
  • (41) 9 8836-2677
  • editora@sevenevents.com.br
  • Support Contact
  • contato@sevenevents.com.br

ADVANCES IN THE SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF GASTRIC CANCER: MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNIQUES VERSUS CONVENTIONAL APPROACHES

Nicolly Thomas Guimarães

Gustavo Ferreira Moreira

Rian Barreto Arrais Rodrigues de Morais

Leonardo Torres Camurça

Giovana Kadri Castilho

Diogo Mariano Hildefonso

Nádia Larissa Souza Cemin

Maurício Menezes Ferreira

José Guilherme Gomes Medeiros Fernandes

Arnoldo Alves Fonseca

Givaldo de Alencar Lima Junior

Karollyne Henriques Lopes Viali

Stanrley Viali Gomes

Jorge Augusto Soares de Souza

Yuri Ananias de Vasconcelos


Keywords


Abstract

Gastric cancer represents one of the main causes of mortality from neoplasms in the world, especially in developing countries. This study aims to compare clinical, oncological, and quality of life outcomes between minimally invasive surgical techniques, such as laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy, and the conventional open approach in gastric cancer management. A narrative review of the literature was carried out, using databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and SciELO. Studies published in the last ten years that comparatively addressed the different surgical techniques in patients with early and advanced gastric cancer were selected. Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses focusing on perioperative, oncological, and quality of life outcomes. Descriptive studies or studies with a small number of cases were excluded. The data were analyzed descriptively, synthesizing information on intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, recurrence rates, and overall survival. The results showed that minimally invasive techniques have significant benefits in short-term outcomes, such as less surgical trauma, reduced blood loss, and faster recovery. Robotic gastrectomy demonstrated advantages in surgical precision and greater lymph node dissection, while laparoscopic gastrectomy stood out for its economic viability. Long-term oncological outcomes were equivalent between techniques, reinforcing the safety of minimally invasive approaches. However, barriers such as high costs and the long learning curve limit its large-scale implementation. It is concluded that minimally invasive techniques are safe and effective in the management of gastric cancer, and greater training and technological accessibility are needed to expand their application, especially in developing countries.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2024.037-170


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Nicolly Thomas Guimarães, Gustavo Ferreira Moreira, Rian Barreto Arrais Rodrigues de Morais, Leonardo Torres Camurça, Giovana Kadri Castilho, Diogo Mariano Hildefonso, Nádia Larissa Souza Cemin, Maurício Menezes Ferreira, José Guilherme Gomes Medeiros Fernandes, Arnoldo Alves Fonseca, Givaldo de Alencar Lima Junior, Karollyne Henriques Lopes Viali, Stanrley Viali Gomes, Jorge Augusto Soares de Souza, Yuri Ananias de Vasconcelos

Author(s)

  • Nicolly Thomas Guimarães
  • Gustavo Ferreira Moreira
  • Rian Barreto Arrais Rodrigues de Morais
  • Leonardo Torres Camurça
  • Giovana Kadri Castilho
  • Diogo Mariano Hildefonso
  • Nádia Larissa Souza Cemin
  • Maurício Menezes Ferreira
  • José Guilherme Gomes Medeiros Fernandes
  • Arnoldo Alves Fonseca
  • Givaldo de Alencar Lima Junior
  • Karollyne Henriques Lopes Viali
  • Stanrley Viali Gomes
  • Jorge Augusto Soares de Souza
  • Yuri Ananias de Vasconcelos