Seven Editora
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##


Contact

  • Seven Publicações Ltda CNPJ: 43.789.355/0001-14 Rua: Travessa Aristides Moleta, 290- São José dos Pinhais/PR CEP: 83045-090
  • Principal Contact
  • Nathan Albano Valente
  • (41) 9 8836-2677
  • editora@sevenevents.com.br
  • Support Contact
  • contato@sevenevents.com.br

PARENDODONTIC SURGERY: A CASE REPORT

Loiola MMC;
Silva VIP;
Santos IAB;
de Oliveira ABF;
Teixeira AEL;
Silva PIA;
Júnior JCS;
Nogueira LHS;
Damasceno MAF;
Aguiar VR;
Freitas IS;
Cassimiro JM;
Ximenes GS;
Rodrigues ACM;
Filho JSF

Matheus Mendes Carneiro Loiola

Vitória Isterfany Pimenta Silva

Iwry Adryo Bandeira Santos

Ana Beatriz Furtado de Oliveira

Ana Emanuele Lucio Teixeira

Pedro Ivo Angelim Silva

José Carlos Silva Júnior

Luis Henrique dos Santos Nogueira

Maria Aline Ferreira Damasceno

Vinícius Rocha Aguiar

Izabela de Souza Freitas

Joyce Moura Cassimiro

Glailson Sousa Ximenes

Ane Caroline Marques Rodrigues

Josfran da Silva Ferreira Filho


Keywords

Periapical abscess
Periapical surgery
Root cyst

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Endodontics aims to prevent and treat pathological changes in the dental pulp and periapical tissues. Despite the standardized techniques, failures may occur, making paraendodontic surgery an alternative in cases of endodontic failure, especially in the face of persistent periapical lesions. Since the 1990s, endodontic microsurgery has advanced with the development of ultrasonic instruments and biomaterials, increasing success rates to up to 98%. CASE REPORT: A male patient presented with pain after endodontic treatment in tooth 22. Clinical examination revealed a fistula, confirmed by radiography and tomography, associated with a periapical lesion caused by extravasated obturator material. Surgery was performed with a quadrangular flap, exploratory osteotomy, and apical curettage. After removing 2 mm from the root apex, it was decided not to perform retrobturation, opting instead for referral for endodontic retreatment. Closure was done with simple sutures, and the patient was instructed for follow-up. DISCUSSION: The decision for surgery considered the persistent inflammation and limitations of conventional retreatment. Studies indicate that factors such as bacterial resistance and anatomical complexity influence endodontic failure. Surgery allows the repair of periapical tissues by eliminating infections and injuries. CONCLUSION: Paraendodontic microsurgery is effective in cases of endodontic failure, favoring tooth preservation and promoting tissue repair. Follow-up is essential to assess repair and prevent complications.

 

DOI:https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2024.034-003


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Matheus Mendes Carneiro Loiola , Vitória Isterfany Pimenta Silva , Iwry Adryo Bandeira Santos , Ana Beatriz Furtado de Oliveira , Ana Emanuele Lucio Teixeira , José Carlos Silva Júnior, Luis Henrique dos Santos Nogueira , Maria Aline Ferreira Damasceno, Vinícius Rocha Aguiar, Izabela de Souza Freitas, Joyce Moura Cassimiro, Glailson Sousa Ximenes, Ane Caroline Marques Rodrigues, Josfran da Silva Ferreira Filho

Author(s)

  • Matheus Mendes Carneiro Loiola
  • Vitória Isterfany Pimenta Silva
  • Iwry Adryo Bandeira Santos
  • Ana Beatriz Furtado de Oliveira
  • Ana Emanuele Lucio Teixeira
  • Pedro Ivo Angelim Silva
  • José Carlos Silva Júnior
  • Luis Henrique dos Santos Nogueira
  • Maria Aline Ferreira Damasceno
  • Vinícius Rocha Aguiar
  • Izabela de Souza Freitas
  • Joyce Moura Cassimiro
  • Glailson Sousa Ximenes
  • Ane Caroline Marques Rodrigues
  • Josfran da Silva Ferreira Filho