Abstract
This study aimed to analyze the implementation of consensuality in Brazilian Administrative Law, highlighting the legal instruments that enable the resolution of conflicts and the correction of conduct in a negotiated and collaborative manner. Instead of resorting exclusively to litigation, these mechanisms seek solutions that meet the interests of the public administration and individuals, promoting more efficient and transparent management. The main consensual instruments used were addressed, such as the Conduct Adjustment Term (CAT), leniency agreements, mediation, and arbitration. Each of these mechanisms has specific characteristics that make them suitable for different types of situations and conflicts, offering viable alternatives for the solution of administrative issues and promoting speed and specialization in decisions.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2024.031-034