What are the most effective theoretical strategies in teaching Anatomy?

Abstract

Introduction: The anatomical study cannot be limited to the dissection of cadaveric parts or the memorization and identification of structures. It is essential that, in a modern and dynamic approach to this discipline, contextualization is adopted, and above all, the clinical applications of what is studied, in addition to other methods such as 3D images. It is necessary to understand the student's conception of such methods – which are the didactic and scientific evidence at the moment – so that they can make the connection – in the present and the future – with professional life.

Methodology: The research, carried out with 245 students from two educational institutions in Juiz de Fora, aimed to find out: What methodologies were used in their anatomy course; Which one(s) among them is(are) seen as the most effective, and most facilitator(s) of the learning process and approach to clinical practice. The data obtained were processed using the SPSS program, version 20.0. Results: It was evident that the approach to anatomical content based on clinical guidance and contextualization of the subject is somewhat popular among students, although a large number prefer simpler, more targeted theoretical classes and more concise teaching material, with a statistical relationship. The use of radiological images is seen as more widespread in Medicine and Dentistry, just as the seminar strategy is more used in Pharmacy, Nursing, Biology, Physical Education, and Nutrition courses. Conclusion: Most students preferred studying based on shorter and leaner theoretical classes, with more concise scripts and textbooks; however, they approve that some contextualization and clinical correlation be made. Each course, or group, has a favorite method of studying Anatomy.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2024.012-041